Analisis Perbandingan Respons Chatgpt Dan Gemini Dalam Penyelidikan Takhrīj Al-Ḥadīth
Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Gemini Responses in Research on Takhrīj Al-Ḥadīth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53840/zxtw4902Keywords:
Kecerdasan Buatan; ChatGPT; Gemini; Autentikasi; TakhrījAbstract
Kemunculan teknologi kecerdasan buatan (AI) menerusi penggunaan model pembelajaran mesin dan pemprosesan bahasa semula jadi (NLP) menyaksikan bidang hadis turut mendapat manfaatnya melalui lapangan penyelidikan takhrīj al-ḥadīth. Namun, keupayaan model generatif AI ini yang dilihat mempunyai limitasi dan cabaran melibatkan isu autentikasi, etika dan kebolehpercayaan respons yang diberikan oleh teknologi ini masih menjadi perbincangan. Justeru, kajian ini meneliti tahap kebolehupayaan dua model kecerdasan buatan generatif, ChatGPT dan Gemini, dalam konteks penyelidikan takhrīj al-ḥadīth, satu disiplin penting dalam menilai kesahihan dan sumber asal hadis. Penilaian dilakukan merangkumi ketepatan maklumat dan keterangkuman jawapan yang diberikan berkaitan empat subtopik takhrīj al-ḥadīth iaitu prinsip asas takhrīj, teknik pencarian sumber hadis, analisis pokok sanad, dan pelaporan takhrīj. Dapatan menunjukkan ChatGPT dilihat unggul dari segi ketelitian ilmiah dan kefahaman epistemologi, manakala Gemini menonjol dalam penyampaian sistematik dan kemudahan penggunaannya. Secara kesuluruhannya, kedua-dua plaform AI ini berupaya menjadi medium berkesan dan saling melengkapi dalam menyelesaikan persoalan sumber dan rujukan asal hadis. Namun, penelitian lanjut melalui proses silang semak kepada sumber asal dan rujukan kepada pihak berautoriti masih diperlukan bagi memastikan kredibiliti dan autoriti jawapan yang dihasilkan. Kajian ini juga memberi sumbangan penting terhadap pemahaman integrasi AI dalam kajian hadis serta metodologi penggunaan AI dalam pengajian Islam agar selaras dengan prinsip ketulenan dan kesahihan turāth Islam dalam era digital.
Downloads
References
‘Abbas, A., & Hussain, M. (2021). A Literature Review of Artificial Intelligence. UMT Artificial Intelligence Review, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.32350/AIR.11.01.
Adawiah Hosni, M. F. M. A. & H. I. (2023). Isu Dan Cabaran Chatgpt Terhadap Pengajian Islam. Al-Turath:Journal of Al Al-Quran and Al-Sunnah, 8(1), 1– 18. https://spaj.ukm.my/jalturath/index.php/jalturath/issue/view/19
Akter, S. N., Yu, Z., Muhamed, A., Ou, T., Bäuerle, A., Cabrera, Á. A., Dholakia, K., Xiong, C., & Neubig, G. (2023). An In-depth Look at Gemini’s Language Abilities. 1-23. http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11444.
Al-Salman, S., & Haider, A. S. (2024). Assessing the accuracy of MT and AI tools in translating humanities or social sciences Arabic research titles into English: Evidence from Google Translate, Gemini, and ChatGPT. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(4), 2483–2498. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2024.5.009.
Apaydin, N. (2025). The Feasibility of Using Artificial Intelligence in Hadith Research. Journal of Sharia nd Islamic Studies, 40(140), 9-64. https://doi.org/10.34120/jsis.v40i140.3479
Arifianto, M., Thoriquttyas, T., & Izzudin, I. (2023). Inquiring Arabic-Islamic Debatable Terms to ChatGPT: Will it Take a Side? Digital Muslim Review, 1, 18–35. https://doi.org/10.32678/dmr.v1i1.2.
Aris, H. (2025). Penilaian Terhadap Kebolehgantungan Kepada Chatgpt Dalam Memahami Taṣḥīf Riwayat Hadith: Assessing ChatGPT’s Competence in Understanding Textual Errors (Taṣḥīf) in Hadith Chains. Journal Of Hadith Studies, 10(1 (SI)), 1–15. https://journalofhadith.usim.edu.my/index.php/johs/article/view/343.
Binbeshr, F., Kamsin, A., & Mohammed, M. (2021). A Systematic Review on Hadith Authentication and Classification Methods. ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing, 20(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434236.
Boden, M. A. (1978). Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 29(4), pp. 267-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(78)90003-6
Cambria, E., Mao, R., Chen, M., Wang, Z., Ho, S. B., & Murugesan, S. (2023). Seven Pillars for the Future of Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 38(6), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2023.3329745
Chukwuere, J. (2024). Today’s Academic Research: The Role of ChatGPT Writing. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 6, 30–46. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v6i1.639.
El Ganadi, A., Vigliermo, R., Sala, L., Vanzini, M., Bergamaschi, S., & Ruozzi, F. (2023). Bridging Islamic Knowledge and AI: Inquiring ChatGPT on Possible Categorizations for an Islamic Digital Library. 2nd International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA 2023), (6-9 November), Rome, Italy. pg. 1-12.
Fatima, S., Desouza, K. C., & Dawson, G. S. (2020). National strategic artificial intelligence plans: A multi-dimensional analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy, 67, 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.07.008.
Ferrag, F., & Bentounsi, I. A. (2024). The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Translation Tasks Case Study of Chat GPT, Claude, and Gemini. Ziglobitha Revue Des Arts, Linguistique, Litterature & Civilisations, 2, 173–192. www.ziglobitha.org.
Hakak, S., Khan, W. Z., Imran, M., Choo, K.-K. R., & Shoaib, M. (2020). Have You Been a Victim of COVID-19-Related Cyber Incidents? Survey, Taxonomy, and Mitigation Strategies. IEEE Access, 8, 124134–124144. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3006172.
Kocyigit, B. F., & Zhaksylyk, A. (2023). Advantages and Drawbacks of Chatgpt in the Context of Drafting Scholarly Articles. Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics, 4(3), 163-167. https://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2023.4.3.04
Mohamad, K., Suliaman, I., & Adnan, M. (2023). Systematic Literature Review On Hadith Authentication Between Year 2000 To 2021. HADIS, 13, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.53840/hadis.v13i25.218.
Naqbi, H., Bahroun, Z., & Ahmed, V. (2024). Enhancing Work Productivity through Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Sustainability, 16(3), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031166.
‘Omar, M., Nassar, S., Hijazi, K., Glicksberg, B. S., Nadkarni, G. N., & Klang, E. (2025). Generating credible referenced medical research: A comparative study of openAI’s GPT-4 and Google’s gemini. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 185, 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109545
Patterson, D. W. (1990). · Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice Hall.
Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2024). Gemini versus ChatGPT: applications, performance, architecture, capabilities, and implementation. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 5, 69–93. https://doi.org/10.48185/jaai.v5i1.1052.
Regona, M., Yigitcanlar, T., Xia, B., & Li, R. Y. M. (2022). Opportunities and Adoption Challenges of AI in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Review. Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, 8(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010045.
Sallam, M., Salim, N., Barakat, M., & Al-Tammemi, A. (2023). ChatGPT applications in medical, dental, pharmacy, and public health education: A descriptive study highlighting the advantages and limitations. Narra J, 3(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v3i1.103.
Setiawan, A., & Luthfiyani, U. (2023). Penggunaan ChatGPT Untuk Pendidikan di Era Education 4.0: Usulan Inovasi Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis. Jurnal Petisi, 4(1), 49–58 journal.unimudasorong.ac.id/index.php/jurnalpetisi/article/view/784.
Setiyanti, A. A., & Pipa, S. (2025). Implikasi Ketergantungan Siswa terhadap Penggunaan Chat GBT sebagai Alat Bantu Pembelajaran dalam Pendidikan di Era Digital. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(3), 3481–3487. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i3.7527.
Tarmom, T., Atwell, E., & Alsalka, M. (2021). Deep Learning vs Compression-Based vs Traditional Machine Learning Classifiers to Detect
Hadith Authenticity. 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04447-2_14.
Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q., & Tang, Y. (2023). A Brief Overview of ChatGPT: The History, Status Quo and Potential Future Development. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 10, 1122–1136. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2023.123618.
Yüksel, A., Köksal, A., Senel, L. K., Korhonen, A., & Schuetze, H. (2024). Measuring Massive Multitask
Language Understanding. In Y. Al-Onaizan, M. Bansal, & Y.-N. Chen (Eds.), Findings of the
Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 (pp. 7035–7055). Association for
Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.413.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 HADIS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Upon acceptance of an article, Authors will be asked to transfer copyright. This transfer will ensure the widest possible dissemination of information. A notification will be sent to the corresponding Author confirming receipt of the manuscript.
If excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the Author(s) must obtain written permission from the copyright owners and credit the source(s) in the article.
Also, this work is licenced under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
